Reconciling special treatment with the duty to prosecute serious human rights violations in Colombian transitional justice
Abstract
On 24 November 2016, the Colombian government and FARC-EP signed a historic peace agreement, establishing the Comprehensive System for Truth, Justice, Reparation, and Non-Recurrence. Central to this system is the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (SJP), which combines restorative justice mechanisms with judicial oversight. This article analyses whether the special treatment measures under the SJP —such as special and alternative sanctions, amnesties, and pardons— comply with Colombia’s obligations under the American Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to investigate and punish serious human rights violations. It examines the proportionality and enforceability of these measures, highlighting their potential to conflict with international duties if not properly implemented. While the SJP’s approach may facilitate peace, it must ensure that the System’s sanctions align with the gravity of crimes committed. This study underscores the need for Colombia’s transitional justice framework to uphold victims’ rights while adhering to international standards.
Received: 10 May 2024
Accepted: 31 March 2025
Downloads
References
Amnesty International. 2018. Colombia: Human Rights and the Peace Agreement. Amnesty International Submission for the UN Universal Periodic Review, 30th Session of the UPR Working Group. Accessed 28 November 2024: https://www.amnesty.org.
Andrey, Cristhian. 2019. «Entre la Justicia y la Paz: El deber de juzgar en el marco de la Justicia Transicional Colombiana», Criterios 12 (2): 85-111.
Bertoni, Eduardo. 2023. «Los límites de un acuerdo de paz: A propósito de los Acuerdos de La Habana», Iuris Dictio 32: 1-22.
Calle, Melba and Yenifer Rodríguez Castillo. 2022. «Dinámicas y tensiones entre los fines retributivos y los fines restaurativos de la pena en el modelo de Justicia Transicional Colombiano: un análisis desde el Acuerdo de Paz de 2016», Revista Criminalidad 64 (2): 143-159.
Castañeda, Juan. 2024. «La justicia mnemónica como mínimo ético del procedimiento dialógico ante la Sala de Reconocimiento de Verdad, Responsabilidad y Determinación de Hechos y Conductas de la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz, para la garantía del derecho de las víctimas en el marco del Caso 01», Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos 35 (1): 1-23.
Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. 2014. What amounts to ‘a serious violations of International Human Rights Law?, Academy Briefing No. 6.
Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Carlos. 2023. «International criminal court standards in a context of transitional justice: evolution and effects of Colombian peace processes (1998-2022)», Journal of International Criminal Justice 21 (3): 579-601.
Human Rights Watch. 1998. Child soldiers used by all sides in Colombia’s armed conflict. Accessed 28 November 2024: https://www.hrw.org.
Human Rights Watch. 2016. Letter to President Santos on the Amnesty Bill. Accessed 28 November 2024: https://www.hrw.org.
ICRC. 2019. Colombia: five armed conflicts. What’s happening? Accessed 28 November 2024: http://www.icrc.org/en/document/colombia-five-armed-conflicts-whats-happening.
Méndez, Shirley and Norberto Hernández Jiménez. 2019. «Justicia restaurativa y Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos» Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional 13: 1-32.
Michalowski, Sabine, Michael Cruz, Astrid Orjuela and Luisa Gómez Betancour, eds. 2020. Terceros civiles ante la jurisdicción especial para la paz- JEP: Guía de orientación jurídica, Bogotá: Dejusticia.
Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Court. 2018a. Report on Preliminary Examinations Activities (2018) – Colombia. Accessed 28 November 2024: http://www.icc-cpi.int.
Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Court. 2018b. The Role of the ICC in the Transitional Justice Process in Colombia. Accessed 24 November 2024: http://www.icc-cpi.int.
Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Court. 2020. Informe sobre las actividades de examen preliminar. Accessed 28 November 2024: http://www.icc-cpi.int.
Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Court. 2023. Report on the situation in Colombia. Accessed 28 November 2024: http://www.icc-cpi.int.
Oficina del Alto Comisionado para la Paz. s/d. Proceso de Paz: Acuerdo sobre las víctimas del conflicto. Accessed 28 November 2024: https://www.altocomisionadoparalapaz.gov.co.
Olásolo, Héctor and Joel Ramírez. 2017. «The Colombian Integrated System of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Non-Repetition», Journal of International Criminal Justice 15 (5): 1011-1045.
Pantoja, Javier A. and Jairo E. Lucero. 2020. «Verdad en una Colombia Transicional: Estándares desde los Sistemas Regionales de Derechos Humanos en el marco de la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz». In La búsqueda de la Verdad: laberintos, ilusiones y expectativas, edited by Michael Reed-Hurtado and Camilo Umaña, 235-302. Bogotá: Universidad del Externado de Colombia.
Ramírez, Camilo and Daniel Quiroga. 2022. «Shredded: Colombia’s special jurisdiction for peace in an increasingly illiberal context of misinformation and backlash», Journal of International Criminal Justice 20 (1): 139-166.
Rondón, Lina. 2023. «Elementos para analizar el contenido restaurativo del reconocimiento por parte de los responsables de crímenes contra la humanidad», Trabajo Social 25 (2): 91-126.
Rueda, Lily and Barbara Holà. 2019. «Punishment in negotiated transitions: The case of the Colombian peace agreement with the FARC-EP», International Criminal Law Review 19 (1): 127-159.
Tamayo, Camilo. 2024. «Between positive complementarity and magical legalism: Colombia and international criminal justice», International Criminal Law Review 24 (5-6): 604-624.
Torres, Henry, Claudia Echeverry and Danilo Ortíz. 2021. «El modelo de justicia transicional y su relación con la justicia retributiva en Colombia», Revista Boletín Redipe 10 (6): 339-355.
UN News. 2017. Colombia: UN Mission collects nearly all remaining weapons from FARC-EP, 20 June. Accessed 1 April 2025: https://news.un.org/en/story/2017/06/560442.
Valencia, Paula and Pedro Francés. 2018. «Legitimidad de la justicia especial para la paz», Revista de Paz y Conflictos 11 (1): 105-133.
Valiñas, Marta. 2020. «The Colombian special jurisdiction for peace: A few issues for consideration when investigating and adjudicating gender and sexual-based crimes», Journal of International Criminal Justice 18 (2): 449-467.
Copyright (c) 2025 University of Deusto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Deusto Journal of Human Rights / Revista Deusto de Derechos Humanos is an Open Access journal; which means that it is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution, and reuse in any medium only for non-commercial purposes and in accordance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the copyright holder (University of Deusto) or the author; provided the original work and publication source are properly cited (Issue number, year, pages and DOI if applicable) and any changes to the original are clearly indicated. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.
3.jpg)
3.jpg)
3.jpg)
.jpg)
