Transitional justice doused in restorative promises: new horizons or old quicksand? A critique of the restorative justice hype promoted by Colombia’s Special Jurisdiction for Peace
Abstract
The promise of restorative justice (RJ) in Colombia’s transitional justice (TJ) mechanisms is often framed as a novel paradigm producing remarkable results. Yet, a significant gap exists between rhetoric and practice. Persons seeking justice for gross violations express concern that RJ primarily benefits perpetrators rather than victims. This paper contrasts the promises promoted by Colombia’s Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) with scholarly RJ literature and the experiences of victims’ families. It critiques the JEP’s use of RJ, emphasizing that restorative approaches are neither new to TJ nor intended to be celebrated uncritically. Experts stress humility and restraint in RJ practice, while the JEP actively promotes its model as a global legacy. Drawing on the voices of Colombians whose relatives were executed by the Colombian Army, this paper highlights how RJ practices shape the experiences of those persons seeking justice and underscores the risks of misusing restorative paradigms in pursuing TJ.
Received: 10 March 2025
Accepted: 30 September 2025
Articles in Press: 11 November 2025
Downloads
References
Acorn, Annalise. 2004. Compulsory compassion: A critique of restorative justice. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Aertsen, Ivo and Brunilda Pali, eds. 2017. Critical restorative justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Ambos, Kai, and Stefan Peters, eds. 2022. Transitional Justice in Colombia: The special jurisdiction for peace. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Asociación de Víctimas del Casanare por la Paz, Casa-Paz. 2024. Letter sent to Chief Justice of the JEP, Roberto Vidal López, Bogotá, 17 April.
Carter School for Peace and Conflict Resolution. 2019. Howard Zehr. Human rights meets restorative justice, Accessed on September 19, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ccz55SO4Ah4.
Doak, Jonathan and David O’Mahony. 2012. «Editorial: Transitional justice and restorative justice», International Criminal Law Review 12: 305–311.
Figari, Rosario, and Juliette Vargas. 2024. «The ‘domino effect’ of ongoing violence on transitional justice: The case of Colombia’s special jurisdiction for peace.» The International Journal of Transitional Justice 17 (3): 435– 52.
Firchow, Pamina. 2017. «Do reparations repair relationships? Setting the stage for reconciliation in Colombia», International Journal of Transitional Justice 11 (2): 315-338.
García Espinosa, Maritza A. 2023. «Justicia restaurativa en la jurisdicción especial para la paz: aplicaciones y retos en la intervención con víctimas del conflicto armado desde el macrocaso 01.» Trabajo social 25 (2): 129–51.
«Interview with Roberto Carlos Vidal López: President of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace in Colombia». 2025. International Review of the Red Cross: 1–8.
Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz, JEP. 2023a. «Audiencia de Reconocimiento de Verdad, Caso 03», Subcaso Casanare, Yopal, 20 de septiembre de 2023. Accessed on October 1, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1WWWhIL7_Y.
Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz, JEP. 2023b. Comunicado. Bogotá, 29 de diciembre de 2023.
Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz, JEP. 2024a. Manual de Justicia Transicional Restaurativa. Colombia. Accessed on September 19, 2025: https://www.jep.gov.co/DocumentosJEPWP/Manual%20JTR.pdf.
Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz, JEP. 2024b. «Lanzamiento nacional del Sistema Restaurativo de la JEP: El futuro hay que sembrarlo juntos.» Usme, Colombia. April 2. Accessed on September 19, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5cNZstK_4Y.
Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz, JEP. 2024c. Second International Conference «Restorative Transitional Justice: Healing, Transformation and Peacebuilding», Bogota, May 2. Accessed on September 19, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLYKK21vsyM.
Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz, JEP. 2025. 70 Logros de la JEP que han transformado el país en 6 años. Colombia.
Ley estatutaria de la JEP, Ley no. 1957 de 2019.
Lyons, Amanda and Michel Reed, eds. 2010. Contested Transitions: Dilemmas of Transitional Justice in Colombia and Comparative Experience. Bogota: International Center for Transitional Justice.
Mamdani, Mahmood. 2000. «The Truth According to the TRC». In The politics of memory: Truth healing and social justice, edited by Ifi Amadiume and Abdullahi A. An-Na’im, 176-183, New York: Zed Books.
Mayans-Hermida, Beatriz E., et al. 2023. «Between Impunity and Justice? Exploring Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Colombia’s Special Sanctions (Sanciones Propias) for International Crimes.» The International Journal of Transitional Justice 17 (2): 192–211.
Michalowski, Sabine, et al. 2024. Principales implicados: La selección de los máximos responsables y partícipes no determinantes en la jurisdicción especial para la paz, lecciones del caso 03. Bogotá: Centro de Estudios de Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad.
Mutua, Makau. 2001. «Savages, Victims, and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights», Harvard International Law Journal 42 (1): 201–45.
Pavlich, George. 2005. Governing Paradoxes of Restorative Justice. London: GlassHouse Press.
Pemberton, Antony and Pauline GM. Aarten. 2017. «A Radical in Disguise: Judith Shklar’s Vicotimology and restorative Justice», in Critical Restorative Justice, edited by Ivo Aertsen and Brunilda Pali, 315-330. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Reed, Michael. 2016. «Killing through the State in the Colombian war and getting away with murder: An exploration of organizational crime and its denial». In Denialism and Human Rights, edited by Roland Moerland, Nelen Hans, and Jan C.M. Willems, 285-314, Netherlands: Instersentia.
Reed, Michael. 2024. «Connivencia con la atrocidad en el Ejército, como si nada,» El Espectador, April 25. Accessed on September 19, 2024: https://www.elespectador.com/judicial/connivencia-con-la-atrocidad-en-el-ejercito-como-si-nada-analisis.
Saffon, María Paula and Uprimny, Rodrigo. 2006. «Transitional Justice, Restorative Justice and Reconciliation», Working Paper. Bogotá: Dejusticia.
Sarkin, Jeremy J. and Ines Pereira. 2023. «Reaching for both justice and peace in Colombia: Understanding the special jurisdiction for peace’s mixed approach (using both retributive and restorative justice) to deal with international crimes.» Contemporary Justice Review, 26 (2): 123–44.
Valencia, Paula, and Paola Molano. 2023. La participación de las víctimas en la JEP y sus efectos restauradores. Bogotá: Centro de Estudios de Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad.
Ward, Tony and Robyn L. Langlands. 2008. «Restorative justice and the human rights of offenders: Convergences and divergences,» Aggression and Violent Behavior 13: 355–372.
Walgrave, Lode. 2017. «Restorative justice is not a panacea against all social evils», in Critical Restorative Justice, edited by Ivo Aertsen, and Brunilda Pali, 95-110. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
Wilson, Richard. 2001. The politics of truth and reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the post-apartheid state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woolford, Andrew. 2009. The politics of restorative justice: A critical introduction. Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.
Zehr, Howard. 2023. Justice: Insights and stories from my journey. Pennsylvania: Walnut Street Books.
Zehr, Howard and Barb Toews, eds. 2004. Critical issues in restorative justice. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Copyright (c) 2025 University of Deusto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Deusto Journal of Human Rights / Revista Deusto de Derechos Humanos is an Open Access journal; which means that it is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution, and reuse in any medium only for non-commercial purposes and in accordance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the copyright holder (University of Deusto) or the author; provided the original work and publication source are properly cited (Issue number, year, pages and DOI if applicable) and any changes to the original are clearly indicated. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.

3.jpg)
3.jpg)
3.jpg)
.jpg)



