The concept of Global Justice as a mean to prevent the violation of Human Rights by extractive industries
Abstract
The paradox of «the natural resources curse» has shown that extractive economies do not contribute positively to the eradication of poverty, discrimination and inequality. On the contrary, these problems seem to worsen in such economies, increasing the levels of corruption, inequality and violence. While advocates of these activities emphasize the advantages of developing extractive industries, their critics underline the environmental, political and social consequences of this industry. It is undeniable, however, that the main cause of social and environmental conflicts in the world, including the violation of fundamental, cultural and environmental rights, is the commodification and exploitation of nature. The global character of extractive industries demands a more comprehensive theory of justice that considers the global challenge and state sovereignty, as well as the complexity that characterizes this type of problem in terms of space, time, agents and subjects. Political philosophers, mostly Anglo-American, have developed various theoretical approaches to global justice that refer to development, redistribution, environmental protection, solidarity, responsibility, the protection of human rights and equity. This article seeks to analyze the extent to which the concept of global justice can contribute to a better understanding and resolution of socio-environmental conflicts related to extractive industries.
Received: 25 June 2020
Accepted: 21 March 2021
Downloads
References
Abumere, Frank. 2015. Different perspectives on global justice: a fusion of horizons. Bielefeld: Universitätsbibliothek.
Amaral, Amaral do y Viviana Palacio. 2018. «Human rights and extractive industries in Latin America: what responsibility of corporations and their States of origin for human rights violations in the Inter-American Human Rights System?». Revista de Direito Internacional 15, n. 2: 50-71.
Arnold, Denis. 2013. «Global justice and international business». Business Ethics Quarterly 23, n. 1: 125-143.
Atapattu, Saman 2018. «Extractive industries and inequality: intersections of environmental law, human rights, and environmental justice». Arizona State Law Journal 50, n. 2: 431-454.
Auty, Richard. 1993. Sustaining development in mineral economies: The resource curse thesis. Nueva York: Routledge.
Bannon, Ian y Paul Collier. 2003. «Natural resources and conflict: what we can do», en Natural resources and violent conflict, options and actions, dirigido por Ian Bannon y Paul Collier, 1-17, Washington: The World Bank.
Barry, Brian. 1995. Why social justice matters. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beitz, Charles. 2005. «Cosmopolitanism and global justice». The Journal of Ethics 9: 11-27.
Beitz, Charles. 2008. «Justice and international relations» en Global Justice, Seminal Essays, editado por Thomas Pogge y Darrel Moellendorf, 21-48, St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
Bernal-Bermúdez, Laura. 2014. «Crimes against humanity: global justice and the human rights discourse». Vniversitas 129: 17-38.
Blake, Michael. 2008. «Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy» en Global Justice, Seminal Essays, vol. 1, editado por Thomas. Pogge y Darrel. Moellendorf, 657-696, St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
Brincat, Shannon. 2015. «Global climate change justice: From Rawls’ law of peoples to Honneth’s conditions of freedom». Environmental Ethics 37, n. 3: 277-305.
Buchanan, Allen. 2002. «Rawls’s laws of people: rules for a vanished Westphalian world», Ethics 110, n. 4: 697-721.
Chaudhuri, Basudeb. 2015. «Identity, nations and the requirements of global justice: limits of the debate in democratic politics». Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 27, n. 2: 129-151.
Cimadamore, Alberto. 2016. «Global justice, international relations and the sustainable development goals’ quest for poverty eradication». Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 32, n. 2: 131-148.
Clark, Nigel, Vasudha. Chhotray y Roger Few. 2013. «Global justice and disasters». Geographical Journal 179, n. 2: 105-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12005
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH). 2015. Pueblos indígenas, comunidades afrodescendientes y recursos naturales: Protección de derechos humanos en el contexto de actividades de extracción, explotación y desarrollo. Washington, DC: Organización de Estados Americanos, Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH). 2020. Empresas y derechos humanos: Estándares interamericanos. Washington, DC: Relatoría Especial Sobre Derechos Económicos Sociales Culturales y Ambientales. REDESCA. Acceso el 2 de febrero del 2021. http://www.oas.org/es/cidh/informes/pdfs/EmpresasDDHH.pdf
Comisión Internacional de Juristas. 2016. Industrias extractivas, Derechos Humanos y conflictos sociales en Perú Informe de misión. Acceso el 10 de febrero 2021. https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Peru-DESC-extractives-Publications-Reports-Facts-Finding-Mission-Report-2016-SPA.pdf
Comité québécois femmes et développement (s.f.). L’impact de l’industrie minière et énergétique sur les droits des femmes. AQOCI. Acceso el 7 de febrero 2021. https://aqoci.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/pdf_impact_de_l_industrie_miniere_sur_les_droits_des_femmes_particulierement_autochtones_-_cdhal_et_faq.pdf
Cuzacq, Nicolas. 2012. Le cadre normatif de la RSE, entre Soft Law et Hard Law, Acceso el 7 de febrero 2021. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00881860/document
Fabre, Cecile. 2005. «Global distributive justice: An egalitarian perspective». Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31: 139-164.
Flores, Imer. 1999. «El liberalismo igualitario de John Rawls, Cuestiones constitucionales. Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional 1: 86-122.
Global Affairs Canada. 2018. Multi-stakeholder advisory board on responsible business conduct abroad, Acceso el 15 de febrero 2021. http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/other-autre/advisory_body-groupe_consultatif.aspx?lang=eng.
Gos, Tatiana. 2016. «La ‘responsabilidad de respetar’ los Derechos Humanos y el establecimiento del deber de debida diligencia como una obligación legal para las industrias extractivas: desafíos y oportunidades en Las Américas», American University International Law Review 32, n. 4: 860-893. Acceso el 9 de febrero 2021. http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr/vol32/iss4/6
Habermas, Jürgen. 2000. Après l’État-nation : une nouvelle constellation politique. Francfort-sur-le-Main: Fayard.
Hayward, Tim. y Yukinori. Iwaki. 2016. «Had we but world enough, and time: integrating the dimensions of global justice». Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19, n. 4: 383-399.
Heath, Joseph. 2005. «Rawls on global distributive justice: a defense». Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31: 193-226.
Ide, Tobias. 2016. «Toward a constructivist understanding of socio-environmental conflicts», Civil Wars 18, n. 1: 69-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2016.1144496
Iglesias, Marisa. 2005. Justicia global y derechos humanos: hacia una ética de las prioridades. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Acceso el 12 de octubre de 2016. https://www.uam.es/otros/afduam/pdf/9/041_070%20marisa%20iglesias.pdf
Kale, Ndiva Kofele. 2009. «Economic Crimes and International Justice: Elevating Corruption to the Status of a Crime in Positive International Law». Paper presented at the Symposium on Corruption and its Implications for Human Rights. Centre for Human Rights and Democracy in Africa Alliance Franco-Camerounaise Center. Buea, 25 June.
Knuckey, Sarah y Eleanor Jenkin. 2015. «Company-created remedy mechanisms for serious human rights abuses: a promising new frontier for the right to remedy?», The International Journal of Human Rights 19, n. 6: 801-827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1048645
Kuehn, Robert R. 2000. «A taxonomy of environmental justice», The University of Alabama School of Law 30: 10.681-10.793. Acceso el 15 de febrero 2021. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1137&context=aprci
La Presse Canadienne. 2019. «Ottawa nomme un premier ombudsman de l’entreprise responsable, sans définir ses pouvoirs». Radio Canada. 8 de abril. Acceso el 15 de febrero 2021.https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1163213/ottawa-nomme-premiere-ombudsman-entreprise-responsable
Laville, Sandra y Emmanuel Akinwotu. 2021. «Nigerians can bring claims against Shell in UK, supreme court rules». The Guardian. 12 de febrero. Acceso el 15 de febrero 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/feb/12/nigeria-communities-can-bring-claims-against-shell-uk-supreme-court-rules
L’Écuyer, René. 1990. Méthodologie de l’analyse développementale de contenu. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Li, Fabiana. 2015. Unearthing conflict: corporate mining, activism, and expertise in Peru. Durham: Duke University Press.
Londoño-Lázaro, Maria Carmelina, Ulf Thoene y Catherine Pereira-Villa. 2017. «The Inter-American court of human rights and multinational enterprises: towards business and human rights in the Americas?», Law & Practice of International Courts & Tribunals 16, n. 3: 437-463. DOI: https://doi-org.ezproxybib.pucp.edu.pe/10.1163/15718034-12341360.
López, Carlos. 2018. «The road towards a legally-binding instrument in regard to corporations and human rights: from corporate social responsibility to the corporations legal responsibility for human rights violations?», International Commission of Jurists, Acceso el 8 de febrero 2021. http://opiniojuris.org/2018/07/23/towards-an-international-convention-on-business-and-human-rights-part-i/
Manirabona, Amissi. 2019. «Toward barrier removal for transnational human rights litigation in Canadian courts», en Extractive Industries and Human Rights in an Era of Global Justice: New Ways of Resolving and Preventing Conflicts, editado por Amissi Manirabona y Yenny Vega, 39-74, Montreal: Lexis Nexis.
Manirabona, Amissi y Yenny Vega. ed. 2019. Extractive industries and human rights in an era of global justice: new ways of resolving and preventing conflicts, Montreal: Lexis Nexis.
Martin, Adrian 2013. «Global environmental in/justice, in practice: introduction». Geographical Journal 179, n. 2: 98-104.
Martin, Adrian, Shawn McGuire y Sian Sullivan. 2013. «Global environmental justice and biodiversity conservation». Geographical Journal 179, n. 2: 122-131.
Martinez-Allier, Joan. 2002. The environmentalism of the poor. A study of ecological conflicts and valuation, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Martinez-Alier, Joan y Mariana Walter. 2016. «Social metabolism and conflicts over extractivism», en Environmental governance in Latin America, editado por Fabio de Castro, Barbara Hogenboom y Michiel Baud, 58-85. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Miller, David. 2001. «Distributing responsibilities», Journal of Political Philosophy 9, n. 4: 453-471.
Miller, David. 2007. National responsibility and global justice. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Miller, Richard. 2010. Globalizing justice: The ethics of poverty and power. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Molina-Portilla, Diana Mª. 2016. «Sistema Interamericano, empresas transnacionales mineras y estados de origen: improcedencia de la excepción de falta de jurisdicción entre estados miembros», International Law, Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional 29: 57-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.il 14-29.siet
Monnet, Eric. 2007. «La théorie des ‘capabilities’ d’Amartya Sen face au problème du relativisme». Tracés, Revue de Sciences humaines 12: 1-14. Acceso el 2 de marzo 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/traces.211
Nagel, Thomas. 1977. «Poverty and food: why charity is not enough», en Food policy: The responsibility of the United States in the life and death choices, editado por Peter G. Brown y Henry Shue, 54-62. Nueva York: The Free Press.
Nagel, Thomas. 2005. «The problem of global justice». Philosophy & Public Affairs 33, n. 2: 113-147.
Nussbaum, Martha. 1988. «Nature, functioning and capability: Aristotle on political distribution». Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 145-184
Nussbaum, Martha. 1992. «Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism», Political Theory 20, n. 2: 202-246.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and human development: The capabilities approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2011. Creating capabilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Office of the High Commissioner, Human Rights (s.f.) Working Group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights. Acceso el 5 de febrero de 2021. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/WGTransCorp/Pages/IGWGOnTNC.aspx
ONU y UE. 2010. Industrias extractivas y conflicto: Kit de herramientas y orientación para la prevención y gestión de conflictos de tierras y recursos naturales. New York, Equipo Marco Interinstitucional para la Acción Preventiva de la ONU.
Peluso, Nancy L. y Michael Watts. 2001. «Violent environments» en Violent Environments, editado por Nancy L. Peluso y Michael Watts, 3-38, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Pogge, Thomas y Darrel Moellendorf. 2008. Global Justice, Seminal Essays, vol. 1. Saint Paul, MN: Paragon House.
Pogge, Thomas. 1994. «An egalitarian law of people». Philosophy and Public Affairs 23, n. 3: 195-224.
Pogge, Thomas 2008. World poverty and human rights: Cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms, 2º ed. Cambridge: Polity.
Pogge, Thomas 2001. «Eradicating systemic poverty: Brief for a global resources dividend», Journal of Human Development 2, n. 1: 2-29.
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. 2018. Buenas prácticas de extracción: Una Guía para que Gobiernos y asociados puedan integrar el medio ambiente y los derechos humanos en la gobernanza del sector minero. Acceso el 8 de febrero 2021. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Sustainable%20Development/Environmental-Governance-Project/UNDP-MINING%20Summary%20Report%20ES.pdf
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 2001. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 2006. Paix et démocratie : Le droit des peuples et la raison publique. Montréal: Boréal.
Reiter, Sandra 2011. «Moral loopholes in the global economic environment: why well-intentioned organizations act in harmful ways». Éthique et économique/Ethics and Economics 8, n. 1: 154-167. Acceso el 9 de febrero 2021. http://ethique-economique.net/
Renaut, Alain. 2013. Un monde juste est-il possible? Paris: Stock.
Risse, Mathias 2012. On global justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sawyer, Suzana y Edmund T. Gómez. eds. 2012. The politics of resource extraction. Indigenous peoples, multinational corporations, and the State. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, UNRISD.
Sen, Amartya. 2008. «Equality of what?» en Global Justice, Seminal Essays, editado por Thomas Pogge y Darrel Moellendorf. 61-82, Saint Paul, MN: Paragon House.
Simmons, Penelope y Audrey Macklin. 2014. The governance gap: Extractive industries, human rights, and the home state advantage. Abingdon: Routledge.
Singer, Peter. 2002. One world: The ethics of globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Soros, George. 2007. «What is the problem with natural resource wealth?», en Escaping the Resource Curse, editado por Macartan Humphreys, Jeffrey D. Sachs y Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1-20. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
Spector, Horacio. 2015. «Two conceptions of justice and the dystopia of global justice». San Diego Law Review 52, n. 5: 1077-1121.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2015. «What global duties do we have?». Global Justice, Acceso el 12 de enero 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-global/
Svampa, Maristella. 2019. Neo-extractivism in Latin America: Socio-environmental conflicts, the territorial turn, and new political narratives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108752589
Tan, Kok-Chor. 2014. «Why global justice matters». Journal of Global Ethics 10: 128-134.
Tzevelekos, Vassilis. 2014. «Reconstructing the effective control criterion in extraterrestrial human rights breaches: Direct attribution of wrongfulness, due diligence, and concurrent responsibility». Michigan Journal of International Law 36: 129-178.
United Nations Global Compact (s.f.) El poder de los principios. Acceso el 7 de febrero 2021. http://www.unglobalcompact.org
United Nations. 2008. Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, UN Doc.A/HRC/8/5. Acceso el 15 de enero 2021. https://www.business-humanrights.org/sites/default/files/reports-and-materials/Ruggie-protect-respect-remedy-framework.pdf.
Urteaga-Crovetto, Patricia. 2012. «The broker state and the ‘inevitability’ of progress: Impacts of the Camisea Project on Indigenous People in Peru», en The Politics of Resource Extraction. Indigenous Peoples, Multinational Corporations and the State, editado por Suzana Sawyer y Edmund T. Gómez, 103-128. New York. Palgrave-MacMillan.
Urteaga-Crovetto, Patricia. 2019. «Rituals for dispossession: Indigenous Peoples, oil and negotiations in the Peruvian northern Amazon basin». En Extractive industries and human rights in an era of Global Justice. New ways of resolving and preventing conflicts, editado por Manirabona, Amissi y Yenny Vega Cardenas, 267-296, Toronto: LexisNexis.
Urteaga-Crovetto, Patricia. 2018. «Implementation of the right to prior consultation in the Andean countries. A comparative perspective». Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 50-1: 7-30. Acceso el 5 de febrero de 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1435616
Villey, Michel. 1986. Philosophie du droit. Paris: Dalloz.
Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (2000). The voluntary principles iniative. Acceso el 7 de marzo 2021. https://www.voluntaryprinciples.org/
Wettstein, Florian. 2014. «On global justice». Business Ethics Quarterly 24, n. 4: 627-630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201424421.
Woods, Cindy, Katharine Valencia y Daniel Cerqueira. 2017. Industrias extractivas y planes nacionales de acción (PNAs) sobre empresas y derechos humanos. Washington DC: Icar. Acceso el 15 de febrero de 2021. http://www.dplf.org/sites/default/files/final_icar_dplf_extractive_sector_naps_guidance_espanol_final_reformatted_bn_kv.pdf.
3.jpg)
3.jpg)
3.jpg)
.jpg)
