Decolonizing Law and expanding Human Rights: Indigenous Conceptions and the Rights of Nature in Ecuador
Abstract
This article critically addresses the crucial aspects for understanding the rights of nature as a resistance platform for indigenous peoples in Ecuador. By basing my arguments in a post-colonial approach to human rights and the concept of coloniality of power, I argue that the lack of inclusion of indigenous knowledge in human rights is a manifestation of neocolonialism. Thus, the introduction of non-Western narratives into the human rights discourse/practice is an attempt to decolonize what has traditionally been a colonialist discourse. Later on, I develop the concept of ‘rights of nature’ arguing that they are a practical example of the inclusion of indigenous narratives in human rights. In the end, the biggest problem is that the dominant Western thought does not challenge the human-nature relationships that are responsible for nature’s degradation. In this regard, I use ethnographic material, post-colonial anthropological theory, and symbolic ecology to argue that Amazonian indigenous nature ontologies —which understand the nature/culture relationship in a very different way— are contained in the rights of nature that the Ecuadorian Constitution enshrines. Therefore, becoming a legal tool with a significant potential for indigenous people’s historical justice.
Received: 01 September 2019
Accepted: 05 December 2019
Published online: 20 December 2019
Downloads
References
Anaya, James. 2008. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous people, S. James Anaya, UN Doc. A/HRC/9/9.
Bengoa, José. 2000. La emergencia indígena en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Borras, Susana. 2016. “New transitions from human rights to the environment to the rights of nature”. Transnational Environmental Law 5(1): 113-143.
Brems, Eva. 2001. Human rights: Universality and diversity. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Colombian Constitutional Court. 2016. Principio de precaución ambiental y su aplicación para proteger el derecho a la salud de las personas – Caso de comunidades étnicas que habitan la cuenca del río Atrato y manifiestan afectaciones a la salud como consecuencia de las actividades mineras ilegales. Sentencia T-622/16.
Cunneen, Chris. 2005. “Colonialism and historical injustice: Reparations for indigenous peoples”. Social Semiotics 15(1): 59-80.
Descola, Phillip. 2013. The ecology of others. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Dirks, Nicholas. 1992. Colonialism and culture. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Donnelly, Jack. 2007. “The relative universality of human rights”. Human Rights Quarterly 29: 281-306.
Garzón, Pedro. 2016. Ciudadanía indígena: Del multiculturalismo a la colonialidad del poder. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
Glendon, Mary Ann. 2004. “El crisol olvidado: La influencia latinoamericana en la idea de los derechos humanos universales”. Persona y Derecho 51:103-123.
Gómez Isa, Felipe. 2010. “International law, ethno-cultural diversity and indigenous peoples’ rights: A postcolonial approach”. International Studies in Human Rights 122: 168-187.
Gómez Isa, Felipe. 2019. “The UNDRIP: An increasingly robust legal parameter”. The International Journal of Human Rights, 23(1-2): 1-15.
Herold, Kiana. 2017. “The rights of nature: Indigenous philosophies reframing law”. Deep Green Resistance News Service Blog, January 8. Accessed 10 May, 2019. https://dgrnewsservice.org/resistance/strategy/rights-nature-indigenous-philosophies-reframing-law/
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 2001. The Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v Nicaragua, Series C, No 79. 31 August.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 2015. Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 about Human Rights and the Environment requested by the Republic of Colombia. https://www.refworld.org.es/docid/5ade36fe4.html
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 2017. Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 about Human Rights and the Environment requested by the Republic of Colombia. Accessed 15 May, 2019. https://www.refworld.org.es/docid/5ade36fe4.html
Keal, Paul. 2003. European conquest and the rights of indigenous peoples: The moral backwardness of international society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. California: University of California Press.
Lupien, Pascal. 2011. “The incorporation of indigenous concepts of plurinationality into the new Constitutions of Ecuador and Bolivia”. Democratization 18(3): 774-796.
Mackay, Fergus. 2004. “Indigenous peoples’ rights to free, prior and informed consent and the World Bank’s extractive industries review”. Sustainable Development, Law & Policy 4: 43-65.
Mignolo, W. 2007. “Introduction: Coloniality of power and de-colonial thinking”. Cultural Studies 21:155-167.
Mullen de Bolivar, Maura. 1998. “A comparison of protecting the environmental interests of Latin-American indigenous communities from transnational corporations under International Human Rights and Environmental Law”. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 8:105-172.
Palmer, Geoffrey. 1992. “Earth summit: What went wrong at Rio”. Washington University Law Quarterly 70: 1005-1028.
Pulitano, Elvira. 2012. “Indigenous Rights and International Law: An Introduction”. Indigenous rights in the Age of the UN Declaration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quijano, Aníbal. 2000. “Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina”. In Cuestiones y horizontes: de la dependencia histórico-estructural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder, edited by Pablo Gentili, 777-832. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Roy, Alpana. 2008. “Postcolonial theory and law: A critical introduction”. Adelaide Law Review 29(2): 315-357.
Sousa Santos, Boaventura de. 1997. “Toward a multicultural conception of human rights”. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 18(1): 1-15.
Sousa Santos, Boaventura de. 2007. “Beyond abyssal thinking: From global lines to ecologies of knowledges”. Binghamton University Review 30(1): 45-89.
Sousa Santos, Boaventura de. 2015. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. London: Routledge.
Schlosberg, David & Carruthers, David. 2010. “Indigenous struggles, environmental justice, and community capabilities”. Global Environmental Politics 10(4): 12-35.
The Guardian. 2017. “Ganges and Yamuna rivers granted same legal rights as human beings”. The Guardian Online News. Accessed 10 November, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/21/ganges-and-yamuna-rivers-granted-same-legal-rights-as-human-beings
United Nations Economic and Social Council. 1994. Final report on human rights and the environment E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/9. Accessed 25 May, 2019. https://undocs.org/en/E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/9
United Nations General Assembly. 1972. United Nations conference on the human environment A/RES/2994. Accessed 11 May, 2019. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f1c840.html
United Nations General Assembly. 2007. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, A/RES/61/295.
Viaene, Lieselotte 2017. “Ríos: seres vivientes y personalidad jurídica. Nuevos argumentos legales de los territorios de los pueblos indígenas” Plaza Pública Web Blog, May 2. Accessed 30 April, 2019. https://www.plazapublica.com.gt/content/rios-seres-vivientes-y-personalidad-juridica-nuevos-argumentos-legales-en-la-defensa-de-los
Viaene, Lieselotte 2018. Water/Human Rights Beyond the Human? Indigenous Water Ontologies, Plurilegal Encounters and Interlegal Translation. ERC Starting Grant 2018. Research Proposals [Part B2].
Walker, Harry. 2012. Under a watchful eye: self, power, and intimacy in Amazonia. California: University of California Press.
Warne, Kennedy. 2018. “A voice for nature”. National Geographic Website. Accessed 11 November, 2019. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/2019/04/maori-river-in-new-zealand-is-a-legal-person/
Watson, Irene. 2014. Aboriginal peoples, colonialism and international law: Raw law. London: Routledge.
Young, Robert. 2003. Post-Colonialism. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zorrilla, Marcelo Gabriel. 2006. “El acta de requerimiento y la guerra justa”. Revista del Notariado 885: 247-255