Beyond the idea of polarization: superdiversity as an alternative perspective for Dutch cities

Keywords: superdiversity, policy categorization, social complexity, governance, polarization, crisis

Abstract

Superdiversity is challenging conventional policy discourses and policy categories. Whereas legal categories and policies assume clearly demarcated groups, superdiversity helps understand the complex intersectionalities that make up today’s cities. When simplistic categories and discourses meet social complexity, this can feed sentiments of crisis and polarization. This article aims to develop superdiversity as a perspective that helps understand rather than deny social complexity. It positions The Netherlands as a revelatory case study on how superdiversity is challenging conventional policy discourses and policy categories. The article shows that discourses on crisis and polarization in Dutch societies can be better understood as misinterpretations of social complexity than as actual tensions between clearly demarcated groups. A superdiverse society involves a high degree of fragmentation, as a result of the broader processes of globalization, individualization and technologization. Migration and diversity have come to symbolize discomfort with these processes.

Received: 13 May 2025; Accepted: 15 May 2026

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdou, Leila H., and Andrew Geddes. 2020. Managing superdiversity? Examining the intercultural policy turn in Europe. In Superdiversity, policy and governance in Europe, edited by Jenny Phillimore, Nando Sigona and Katherine Tonkiss, 7-28. Bristol: Bristol Policy Press.

Crul, Maurice, and Frans Lelie. 2023. The new minority: People without a migration background in the superdiverse city. VU publishing/VU university Press. https://vuuniversitypress.com/wp-content/uploads/20230817-The-new-minority-online-file.pdf.

Crul, Maurice, Jens Schneider, and Frans Lelie. 2013. Superdiversity. A new vision of integration. Amsterdam: VU University Press.

Crul, Maurice, and Jens Schneider. 2010. «Comparative integration context theory: Participation and belonging in new diverse European cities.» Ethnic and Racial Studies 33(7): 1249-1268.

Engbersen, Godfried and Peter Scholten. 2018. The world in a city; migration diversity and urban policy in Europe. Amsterdam: WRR.

Engbersen, Godfried and Erik Snel. 2013. «Liquid migration. Dynamic and fluid patterns of post-accession migration flows.» In Mobility in transition. Migration patterns after EU enlargement, edited by Birgit Glorius, Izabela Grabowska-Lusinska and Aimee Kuvik, 21-40. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Entzinger, Han. 2000. «The dynamics of integration policies: A multidimensional model.» In Challenging immigration and ethnic relations politics: Comparative European perspectives, edited by Ruud Koopmans and Paul Statham, 97-118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Entzinger, Han. 2006. «Changing the rules while the game is on: From multiculturalism to assimilation in the Netherlands.» In Migration, citizenship, ethnos, edited by Y. Michal Bodemann and Gökçe Yurdakul, 121-144. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.

Entzinger, Han and Edith Dourleijn. 2008. De lat steeds hoger. De leefwereld van jongeren in een multi-etnische stad. Assen: Royal Van Gorcum BV.

Geldof, Dirk. 2016. Superdiversity in the heart of Europe; how migration changes our society. Copenhagen: ACCO.

Harteveld, Eelco, Wouter Van Der Brug, Sarah De Lange and Tom Van Der Meer. 2022. «Multiple roots of the populist radical right: Support for the Dutch PVV in cities and the countryside.» European Journal of Political Research 61(2): 440-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12452.

Hollinger, David A. 1995. Postethnic America: beyond multiculturalism. New York: Hachette.

Ingram, Helen, Anne I. Schneider, and Peter Deleon. 2019. «Social construction and policy design.» In Theories of the policy process, edited by Paul Sabatier, 93-126. New York: Routledge.

Koopmans, Ruud, Paul Statham, Marco Giugni and Florence Passy. 2005. Contested citizenship: Immigration and cultural diversity in Europe. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

Meer, Tom van der and Jochem Tolsma. 2014. «Ethnic diversity and its effects on social capital.» Annual Review of Sociology 40: 459-478.

Meissner, Fran and Steven Vertovec. 2017. Comparing super-diversity. London: Routledge.

Parliamentary inquiry committee on integration policy. 2004. Building bridges. The Hague: SDU.

Phillimore, Jenny, Nando Sigona, and Katherine Tonkiss, ed. 2020. Superdiversity, policy and governance in Europe: multi-scalar perspectives. Bristol: Policy Press.

Schinkel, Willem. 2018. «Against ‘immigrant integration’: for an end to neocolonial knowledge production.» Comparative migration studies 6: 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0095-1.

Scholten, Peter. 2020.Mainstreaming versus alienation: A complexity approach to the governance of migration and diversity. Berlin: Springer Nature.

Scholten, Peter. 2020. «Mainstreaming versus alienation: Conceptualizing the role of complexity in migration and diversity policymaking.» Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46(1): 108-126.

Scholten, Peter. 2023. «The governance of superdiversity: a complexity perspective» In The Oxford handbook of superdiversity, edited by Fran Meissner, Nando Sigona, and Steven Vertovec, 377-388. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scholten, Peter. 2025. De Migratie-Obsessie. Hoe één thema het debat blijft bepalen. Boom.

Scholten, Peter, Maurice Crul, and Paul Van de Laar. 2019. Coming to terms with superdiversity: The case of Rotterdam. Berlin: Springer Nature.

Scientific Council for Government Policy. 2016. Migration and categorization: towards a multiple migration idiom. The Hague: WRR.

Scientific Council for Government Policy. 2018. The new diversity. Increasing diversity by origin in the Netherlands. The Hague: WRR.

Scientific Council for Government Policy. 2020. Living together in diversity. Policy for the migration society. The Hague: WRR.

Vertovec, Steven. 2007. «Super-diversity and its implications.» Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(6): 1024-1054.

Vertovec, Steven. 2019. «Epilogue: What’s the matter with Rotterdam?» In Coming to terms with superdiversity: the case of Rotterdam, edited by Peter Scholten, Maurice Crul and Paul Van de Laar, 237-241. Berlin: Springer.

Vertovec, Steven. 2023. Superdiversity: Migration and social complexity. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.

Wessendorf, Susanne. 2010. Commonplace diversity: Social relations in a super-diverse context. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Zapata-Barrero, Ricard, ed. 2015. Interculturalism in cities: Concept, policy and implementation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Zapata-Barrero, Ricard, Tiziana Caponio, and Peter Scholten. 2017. «Theorizing the ‘local turn’ in a multi-level governance framework of analysis: A case study in immigrant policies.» International Review of Administrative Sciences 83(2): 241-246.

Published
2026-06-26
How to Cite
Scholten, Peter. 2026. “Beyond the Idea of Polarization: Superdiversity As an Alternative Perspective for Dutch Cities”. Deusto Journal of Human Rights, no. 17 (June), 37-61. https://doi.org/10.18543/djhr.3532.